Then the story took one other flip when the Canadians returned to the ice on Saturday. Controversy flared round Kennedy once more, with Switzerland reporting him to the umpire for a similar offence of their 9-5 win.
Once more, no motion was taken towards the 44-year-old veteran of 4 Olympics.
At that stage, World Curling wanted to behave. They introduced they might deploy additional officers for the rest of the Video games to verify for double-touching.
Canadian girls’s skip Rachel Holman was pinged for a double contact. Group GB’s Bobby Lammie fell sufferer too.
Each incidents have been a case of a lingering finger falling on to the granite after the deal with was launched, reasonably than a deliberate contact, so no suggestion of devious intent. Moreover, the monitoring of it appeared sporadic.
The groups have been up in arms and complained. World Curling relented. The protocol was modified on Sunday. Groups may now request to have the stone supply monitored if that they had suspicions, and for no less than three ends.
In actuality, that was additionally haphazardly executed.
So what does curling do about this? In any case, it is a sport wherein they decide which stone is nearest the goal through the use of what’s successfully a giant compass.
One nod to progress is electrical sensors to gauge if stones have been launched earlier than the hog line however may they drag themselves additional into the fashionable period and use video know-how?
Group GB lead Hammy McMillan thinks so.
“You usher in VAR or Hawk-Eye and every crew will get a problem or two, so you have to be useless sure that any person did that [violation],” the Scot mentioned.
“I believe that might be fairly cool, it could perhaps make curling a bit extra modernised. I believe video evaluation may very well be the following factor, with groups getting challenges.”
